Carl
> This is also filed [upstream](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/132749818) That issue requires sign-in to be viewed. This feature looks like something OEMs use a lot too; I could only find [this outdated blog...
This seems to be an API level 26 (Android 8.0) feature according to https://readyandroid.wordpress.com/2019/12/31/java-lang-securityexception-failed-to-find-provider-for-user-0-expected-to-find-a-valid-contentprovider-for-this-authority/ Relevant documentation section is here: https://developer.android.com/about/versions/oreo/android-8.0-changes#ccn I am absolutely in the dark on how to implement...
The `onBackup`/`onRestore` logic is in https://github.com/chromium/chromium/blob/89.0.4389.78/chrome/android/java/src/org/chromium/chrome/browser/ChromeBackupAgentImpl.java It would need to be enabled with: ``` diff --git a/chrome/android/java/AndroidManifest.xml b/chrome/android/java/AndroidManifest.xml index e4845fe382a0..73396f3372b5 100644 --- a/chrome/android/java/AndroidManifest.xml +++ b/chrome/android/java/AndroidManifest.xml @@ -152,14 +152,13 @@ by...
I made a summary here some time ago: https://github.com/bromite/bromite/wiki/AdBlocking If I were to allocate development efforts nowadays I'd either build on top of Chromium's own one (never checked feasibility though)...
> They want to avoid having so many addons intercepting / modifying network requests and directly accessing / modifying the content of the page since there are so many malicious...
> I'm very happy that Chromium is moving in this direction The worthiness of this change will be judged in the capacity of extensions authors to achieve the same level...
FYI in v76 the preference `CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_ADS` becomes directly dependant on the safe browsing component, thus development of this issue might become more closely coupled to #35. In Bromite my choice...
@thestinger sure; to go back on the topic of content filtering: I have found some issues in v76, which I previously mistakenly attributed to the SafeBrowsing component, but they are...
@thestinger quoting [your comment from another issue](https://github.com/GrapheneOS/Vanadium/issues/10#issuecomment-514703319): > I would like to take an approach like Brave for Safe Browsing, although not using the Play Services implementation on mobile. The...
> GrapheneOS users can currently use it in Vanadium if they're using sandboxed Google Play since we aren't currently removing all of the Play services SDK partly since FIDO authentication...