Carl

@uazo please use the issue template, you removed `Is your feature request related to privacy?`

There is nothing to keep secret: all the methods to detect incognito are already discovered by open source or closed source Javascript libraries. Keep it all in the open.

> I hope I am wrong and have not given new useful information to derive the incognito mode. You could submit them to the Chromium issue tracker; perhaps there are...

> do you agree to solve them as I indicated? it doesn't hurt, in any It needs to be checked case by case: > ### detection via http headers and...

> > Before reverting it one should understand why it was made; it looks like they introduced a bug there because sending the first locale was not the original intent...

> > > detection via capture video manager > > > Equivalent to user denying it. > > > > > > for bromite yes, there being the autoplay blocker,...

> > isn't this this the permission for the camera? > > no, from what I had seen (but we are talking about chromium desktop), even if that permission is...

> > I probably need a diagram to understand this. > > the problem does not exist in android as captureStream is not supported. basically, with the desktop version, [captureStream](https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/capture/video-video/)...

> > and no option needed since there are no privacy concerns involved here. > > but it could be used to identify incognito mode Can you explain how? >...

> > Can you explain how? > > no, I don't know yet, when I do I tell you. > > > Adding a search engine is not a trace,...