chore: fix inconsistent struct name in comment
๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป
PR Checklist:
- [x] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
- [ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
- [ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
- [ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (
make) - [ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
- [ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (
make test) - [ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (
go fmt) - [ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (
golangci-lint run) - [ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (
go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth) - [ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
- [ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
- [ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
- [ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.
fix inconsistent struct name in comment
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
Documentation
- Corrected an API comment to reference the proper response type, clarifying the request/response pairing.
- Confirmed no changes to message structures, fields, or runtime behavior.
- Improves clarity in API docs to help integrators implement and troubleshoot more easily.
Walkthrough
Updated a comment in proto/cronos/query.proto to correctly reference ContractByDenomResponse as the response type above its message definition; no message fields, RPCs, or behavior were changed.
Changes
| Cohort / File(s) | Change summary |
|---|---|
Proto docs fixproto/cronos/query.proto |
Corrected inline comment to state ContractByDenomResponse (previously mislabeled). No schema, RPC, or logic changes. |
Estimated code review effort
๐ฏ 1 (Trivial) | โฑ๏ธ ~2 minutes
Poem
I nibble at comments with whiskers so keen,
A typo hops out and is tidy and clean.
No contracts were harmed, no messages swapped,
Just a note in the proto, politely cropped.
Hopโdocs aligned, and my garden's well-topped! ๐ฅ๐
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches
โ Passed checks (3 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Description Check | โ Passed | Check skipped - CodeRabbitโs high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check | โ Passed | The title 'chore: fix inconsistent struct name in comment' accurately describes the main change, which is correcting an inline comment that incorrectly identified the struct name in proto/cronos/query.proto. |
| Docstring Coverage | โ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
โจ Finishing touches
๐งช Generate unit tests (beta)
- [ ] Create PR with unit tests
- [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
๐ Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
๐ฅ Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e61b1e74eb72ee3af8c2752a445c7a226f3a1824 and b9e3c9f044753d1b9cac710cca08545e86d996a3.
โ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
-
x/cronos/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
๐ Files selected for processing (1)
-
proto/cronos/query.proto(1 hunks)
โฐ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (17)
- GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (gov)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_rly_gas)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (slow)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (upgrade)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ica)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_update_client)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (gas)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (unmarked)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_rly_evm)
- GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_timeout)
- GitHub Check: unittest
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-14)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
๐ Additional comments (1)
proto/cronos/query.proto (1)
55-55: Verify that generated protobuf files were regenerated.The comment fix is correct and now consistently identifies
ContractByDenomResponseas the response type. However, the previous reviewer (randy-cro) explicitly requested runningmake proto-gento update the generated.pbfiles. Please confirm that the generated protobuf files (e.g.,.pb.go,.pb.gw.go, or similar) have been regenerated and committed alongside this change.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
please verify your commits
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 35.47%. Comparing base (a3c2f70) to head (b9e3c9f).
:warning: Report is 120 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1860 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 16.87% 35.47% +18.60%
===========================================
Files 72 127 +55
Lines 6163 9730 +3567
===========================================
+ Hits 1040 3452 +2412
- Misses 5000 5910 +910
- Partials 123 368 +245
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
Executed and signed. Please review again.