Jens Wilke

@a1730, Thank for the background and the additional links! > Yes, we already have some rules to exclude checker framework proposals. That means that if cache2k would use the checker...

You can find the OSGi bundle and tests used for cache2k 1.4 and 1.6 here: https://github.com/cache2k/cache2k/tree/service-1.4/cache2k-osgi-all https://github.com/cache2k/cache2k/tree/service-1.4/test-osgi I didn't experiment with Aries. Maybe the bnd SPI annotations are worth a...

@roggenbrot Thanks for you input! > Problem is, that some of them don't play nice with OSGI the way they current are if you really want to have api/core as...

> Keep existing jars, but provide a cache2k-osgi-all for OSGi users which bundles together everything. The bundle would contain config and JMX as well. We had that approach before. I...

@roggenbrot Cool, thanks for the example code! > If this should be possible, have you ever thought about what should happen if there are more then one registered Cache2kCoreProvider implementations?...

> For cache2k-jmx I'd actually like to enable registering JMX beans, if the jar is included. BTW: I needed to let that sit for a while. I decided now that...

@hc-codersatlas: You can run the benchmarks with traces as explained in https://cruftex.net/2016/05/09/Java-Caching-Benchmarks-2016-Part-2.html Be aware that this is rather academic and any result may or may not apply to your actual...

The last days I've been working quite a bit on the eviction. For the tests of the adaption algorithm of Caffeine Ben was using a trace that leads to quite...

I double checked. I missed to take over a tiny change from the testbed version to production. I will do a new release tomorrow. My bad. Release early, release often.......

V2.6 gets a tiny chance because I discovered a not optimal behavior. The current eviction algorithm (V1.x - V2.4) inserts entries evicted from hot into the ghost history. However, that...