Public Version: Contributor License Agreement
Issue migrated from trac ticket # 130
component: unknown | priority: major
2016-01-18 02:17:02: @jjeising created the issue
We probably want a CLA.
Examples maybe 1 and 2. There is also 3 with nice Github Autofill.
Comments on that topic?
2016-03-02 19:25:17: @a-tze commented
What will be the license of the Public Version actually?
2016-03-02 19:31:50: @jjeising commented
This should be the question of another issue. Currently Apache seems most feasible.
2017-03-05 11:46:21: @pegro commented
Which legal entity is then the "The Company" part of the CLA?
2017-03-06 01:17:39: @jjeising commented
Which legal entity is then the "The Company" part of the CLA?
That's a very good question. A GbR is probably the most feasible. (Gemeinnütze) Stiftung would feel a little better, but seems to require significant financial capital. The GbR requires naming all associates, which goes against the idea of a flexible legal entity which just manages rights. It's complicated?