Update to Documentation!
This is the work I've done so far for the documentation! Let me know your thoughts :)
[!IMPORTANT]
Review skipped
Draft detected.
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the
.coderabbit.yamlfile in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the@coderabbitai reviewcommand.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_statustofalsein the CodeRabbit configuration file.
β¨ Finishing touches
π§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
- [ ] Create PR with unit tests
- [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 81.00%. Comparing base (bce38f0) to head (cf92423).
:warning: Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #579 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.69% 81.00% +1.31%
==========================================
Files 137 137
Lines 13467 11083 -2384
==========================================
- Hits 10732 8977 -1755
+ Misses 2310 1680 -630
- Partials 425 426 +1
| Flag | Coverage Ξ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 81.00% <ΓΈ> (+1.31%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
I'll have a look at it during the week or at the week-end, thank you for your help ππ»
Just wanted to bump this to bring to your attention! Lemme know if the direction this is heading at is looking good!
Hi!
I finally got a bit of time to look at it. I can see the reorganisation of the chapters makes sense to me, that's nice, thank you ππ»
Sadly I can't try to view the result locally, I get an error on building it with Hugo:
ERROR [en] REF_NOT_FOUND: Ref "/reference/jsonschema": "/go/src/github.com/creativeprojects/resticprofile/docs/content/configuration/profiles/editorConfig.md:7:64": page not found
Are you using a different version of Hugo by any chance?
Ah! I see what's happened. To explain:
- "/reference/jsonschema" wasn't found in /docs/content/configuration/profiles/editorConfig.md:7:64
- Checking my repo, /docs/content/reference is empty
This is different than my working version, which has the following under the same dir:
I've pushed a change that just updates the link, it should be good!
Cool I can browse the doc locally, it's easier to see that way ππ»
I'm not too sure why the pipeline is failing: it works when I run the script to check all the links locally (via make checklinks)
Build looks to be failing at the check broken links, which makes sense/is to be expected (seeing as the update to the docs would move a lot of the links around)