Tim Caswell
Tim Caswell
I've not tried working with the backoff configurations. That may enough. I'm also a sucker for simplicity.
Neat idea. Do you have time to prototype this?
I could see this being done in two places. One would be in the tap module with hooks in luvit's require system. Another would be a new lit command. We...
I actually prefer gitter since it has much nicer features. We just use IRC for because of historical momentum. I'd like to keep the gitter room for now, we can...
Hmm, the behavior in both is correct, you are sending different amounts of command line arguments. Maybe we could have luvit start indexing at `-1` and the path to the...
There are also other issues trying to make code that's portable between luvit and luvi. In luvit, you can `fs.readFile` relative to `module.dir` to load assets, while in the luvi...
@rphillips, if we shift the args so that `-1` is the luvit runtime, `0` is the script, and the rest are the app-level args, then it will match luvi (which...
This and #713 would make code much more portable between luvit and luvi apps.
Ok, a new problem is what do we do with luvit flags? If we hide the script name from args, shouldn't we also hide flags that are passed to luvit...
I really want to make this change before there are too many luvit apps to modify.