cpuu
Issues with fuzzers list and categorization
Hi, there are several missing fuzzers in the list like the popular honggfuzz and AFLplusplus. The categorization is broken. For instance, libFuzzer is not a Binary fuzzer, but a source-level fuzzer. AFL supports both, source and binary. Regards the Web/Javascript there are two independet categories merged. The first, is the JS engines fuzzers like fuzzilli and CodeAlchemist, that are C/C++ source-level fuzzers made to test JS engines, the other are JS code fuzzer that are far away different (and less complex let me to say that) than JS engines fuzzers.
Ah and T-Fuzz is not a network protocol fuzzer but a binary-only fuzzer based on program transformation.
Thank you for more information. You know a lot about the various tools. Can you suggest an appropriate category re-organization? In fact, I only check the paper, and I do not know exactly the tools that correspond to it.
Since there has been no response for four years, I am closing this issue. I have decided to reorganize according to the classification criteria found at https://fuzzing-survey.org/. The update will be carried out within a month.