Phillip Cloud
Phillip Cloud
@hazirliver Thanks for the report, looks like a bug!
Naturally, this is possible with a bit of elbow grease, and it's a bit annoying: 1. Get the known types from the database (run `psql -E` and then run `\dT+`...
This doesn't work yet, because our custom `PostgresType` subclass of `SqlglotType` doesn't handle the parse error from sqlglot, that's only handled in the parent class, and `PostgresType` is calling `sg.parse_one`...
Closing, as I don't think I can maintain this code at the moment. We can always revisit later!
Thanks for the issue! Can clarify what you're asking for here? Is it just to "officialize" the API?
I wonder whether there's room for a different API for `distinct` that combines the ordering and keep specifications into a single composable API. ```python t.distinct(on=..., keep=_.first(order_by=expr)) ``` The underscored operation...
How does `ibis.table` fit into this issue? We should definitely avoid stuffing **more** functionality into `ibis.table`. We're already considering giving it two distinct behaviors. Adding another one is not a...
> just to be sure, you mean 1. a table unbound to data and 2. a table bound to data? That's correct.
> Am I missing something that makes these two use cases different? I think so. > this feature request is about constructing a Table from some columns and scalars. Yes,...
We should avoid god functions that accept huge varieties of inputs and supposedly "just do the right thing" because that's basically never the case, or it comes with some awful...