Tatu Saloranta
Tatu Saloranta
@swayamraina I think this is what is requested.
I think you are correct here: I had not thought of limitations that `BigInteger` and `BigDecimal` have wrt unbounded magnitude/precision. If you can suggest improvements to wording of the specification,...
My recollection may be wrong, but I thought JSON Schema didn't support all Java native types? See f.ex: https://github.com/saasquatch/json-schema-inferrer/issues/17 and from there: https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/type If so, choices are `number` (more generic)...
Yes, I understand why it would be useful, just pointing out limitations. I probably should also mention that this module is deprecated and no longer actively developed -- there are...
You need to be bit more specific explaining what kind of support you would be thinking. Jackson does not support RPC at all (that's a layer above), although JAX-RS providers...
ES6 compatible serialization, outlining specifics, would fall under `jackson-core` I assume. Would this entail something other than try to limit range of 64-bit longs and such?
Ah. No wonder this sounded familiar: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/252
Hi @LDVSOFT as @pjfanning pointed out, `jackson-bom` exists (so it's a good idea but already done). Gradle's GMM may or may not work, but it is also included in the...
This seems to work as expected: `getSomethingAboutA()` is a valid getter and Jackson does consider there to be a property. This is by design; by default public getters/setters with Bean-compatible...
Glad it works @rohnigam!