Tatu Saloranta
Tatu Saloranta
@wujimin Since this is not related to question of protobuf 3 support, could you please add it either to an existing issue that is related to `Map` support (I think...
@wujimin I would be interested in performance part, as Jackson backend should have performance comparable to protostuff (when binding to POJOs). Not necessarily faster, but similar. So mostly interested in...
@wujimin Thanks!
Usually when there is progress there are notes here so I assume no progress unfortunately.
The only blocker here is the lack of resources -- someone to write the code, test. Support need not wait until Jackson 3; nor is there anything specific within Jackson...
Thank you @jedvardsson (and apologies for slow follow up). Please let me know if you need any help! And any findings, suggestions might be helpful too -- perhaps there are...
Quick note: Should be (more) doable with Jackson 2.8, planning to add `JsonParser` support to make it possibly to efficiently and simply support a small set of "well-known" array types;...
So, explicit array writes are now included for `int[]`, `long[]` and `double[]`: if packed arrays functionality becomes official CBOR feature it should be much easier to support those now.
I think you are right; tagged types have been added over time, and were not there when the module was implemented. Although implementing support is theoretically bit tricky since Jackson's...
@sbernard31 Ok thank you for sharing this. I would be interested in helping with logical data types, as well as integration issues. If you (or anyone else) has time, we...