Lower coverage reported than Visual Studio

[subramaniamb]

I have a query on the coverage reported by coverlet. In my Xamarin project, the coverage reported by Visual Studio with the runsettings is 80% where as the coverage reported by coverlet with the same runsettings is 44%. I am unable to figure out the root cause. @MarcoRossignoli : Could you please help?

[MarcoRossignoli]

Can you try to compare the report generated by visual studio and for instance https://github.com/danielpalme/ReportGenerator (for coverlet report)

I mean to understand which pieces of code are different.

[subramaniamb]

@MarcoRossignoli : Really appreciate your quick response.

On comparing the report with VS, I could see that the folders/files excluded in runsettings is not being considered. Also, noticed that the coverage is same with/without runsettings. Any thoughts?

[mmuecke]

I have the same issue. You can find an example here: https://github.com/mmuecke/RxMQTTnet/pull/18 In VS 100% and 84.21% with coverlet collector (https://codecov.io/gh/mmuecke/RxMQTTnet/compare/dc6b99f4e2024a2a37feb83651c3b4022626e236...cc663c761b2117d3445d4b3ba0aa7d384a6e5bfe/changes)

[MarcoRossignoli]

@mmuecke I think you issue is different, you're using version 3.0.0 and there is a bug we found and fixed, well release 3.0.1 soon https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet/issues/1037

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open for 3 months with no activity.