Add osdf-client

[duncanmmacleod]

Checklist

• [x] Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• [x] License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• [x] Source is from official source.
• [x] Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• [x] If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• [x] Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• [x] Build number is 0.
• [x] A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• [x] GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• [x] When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/stashcp) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[duncanmmacleod]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes, this recipe is ready for review, thanks.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/osdf-client) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[duncanmmacleod]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes, this recipe is ready for review, thanks.

[conda-forge-webservices[bot]]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/osdf-client) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[duncanmmacleod]

Seems like you're trying to publish a fork of a package. We cannot publish the htcondor fork of stashcp under the stashcp name. That would probably be brand hijacking.

We can publish the upstream project, or the fork needs to be rebranded/renamed.

e.g. there are 3 coreutils packages: gnu-coreutils, uutils-coreutils, and m2-coreutils.

Thanks @carterbox. @djw8605 is the primary developer, and owner of both projects, so can hopefully explain that the fork relationship is a relic of the development history and will be sorted out behind-the-scenes.

[duncanmmacleod]

In the mean time, the 'upstream' opensciencegrid/stashcp project has been archived to mark it as dead.

@conda-forge/staged-recipes, this is ready for another review, thanks.

[duncanmmacleod]

Ping @conda-forge/staged-recipes, this is ready for review.

[duncanmmacleod]

Ping @carterbox, are you able to re-review this recipe? Thanks.

[carterbox]

I see that the README for the upstream project has been updated to indicate that it is archived. Please allow me to re-review this PR.