Add dphtools recipe

[goanpeca]

Checklist

• [x] Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• [x] License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• [x] Source is from official source.
• [x] Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• ~[ ] If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.~
• [x] Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• [x] Build number is 0.
• [x] A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• [x] GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• [x] When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/dphtools) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[goanpeca]

We are in the process of creating conda packages for napari plugins and related dependencies. Once this recipe passes all the checks, every time a new release goes into PyPI, a PR will be created automatically, with usually very minor need for changes so the process of maintaining this moving forward is small. Also the @conda-forge/napari team will be available to help as needed.

You can read a bit more about conda-forge at https://conda-forge.org/#contribute

---

@jaimergp, @david-hoffman do you agree with being added as maintainers?

[david-hoffman]

Sure

[goanpeca]

This one is ready for review @conda-forge/staged-recipes :)

[goanpeca]

This one is ready for review https://github.com/orgs/conda-forge/teams/staged-recipes :)