feat(conventional_commits): add ability to overide settings from tool…

[AxTheB]

….commitizen.customize

Description

Adds ability to override settings using [tool.commitizen.customize] in the cz_conventional_commits

Checklist

• [x] I have read the contributing guidelines

Code Changes

• [x] Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
• [x] Run poetry all locally to ensure this change passes linter check and tests
• [x] Manually test the changes:
  • [x] Verify the feature/bug fix works as expected in real-world scenarios
  • [x] Test edge cases and error conditions
  • [x] Ensure backward compatibility is maintained
  • [x] Document any manual testing steps performed
• [x] Update the documentation for the changes

Documentation Changes

• [x] Run poetry doc locally to ensure the documentation pages renders correctly
• [x] Check and fix any broken links (internal or external) in the documentation

Expected Behavior

You use conventional_commits commitizen, and using [tool.commitizen.customize] config section you override selected settings

Steps to Test This Pull Request

Add this to pyproject.tomp in existing project using conventional_commits and update_changelog_on_bump = true:

[tool.commitizen.customize]
change_type_map = {"feat" = "✨ Feat", "fix" = "🐛 Bug Fix", "refactor" = "♻️  Refactor", "perf" = "⚡️ Perf"}

do cz bump --dry-run and observe that changelog headers have gitmoji. Test that other behavior is identical to unpatched version test that bump_map = {"^.+!$" = "MAJOR", "^feat" = "MAJOR", "^fix" = "MINOR", "^refactor" = "MINOR", "^perf" = "MINOR"} bumps MINOR not PATCH part on fix commit, test that other things are unchanged. Test other settings.

Additional Context

This is starting shot at #1385 To test this I copied tests for cz_customize, removed name=... from all configs there and removed the tests that don't make sense, for example exception for missing customize section.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 98.26%. Comparing base (120d514) to head (80b550c). :warning: Report is 807 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1570      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.33%   98.26%   +0.92%     
==========================================
  Files          42       58      +16     
  Lines        2104     2714     +610     
==========================================
+ Hits         2048     2667     +619     
+ Misses         56       47       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	98.26% <100.00%> (+0.92%)	:arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[AxTheB]

I decided not to drag in the jinja2.Template/string.Template dichotomy, as jinja2 is project dependency so the string.Template part will be unused.