zod
zod copied to clipboard
colinhacks
[docs] add notice about strictObject
Found strictObject in this ticket and i wondered if i missed it in the docs, but it cannot be found.
Deploy Preview for guileless-rolypoly-866f8a ready!
Built without sensitive environment variables
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | a64f385fd0fbca5986950131c6df579aeacad167 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/guileless-rolypoly-866f8a/deploys/6490124a0980660008f15830 |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-2512--guileless-rolypoly-866f8a.netlify.app |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
![netlify[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/13473?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
![stale[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1724?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
In the issue, I also saw that it is "the recommended approach". I just find it weird that it's not recommended anywhere 🤔
I appreciate the PR, though tbh I'd prefer people not use this. It opens up the door to a bunch of top-level APIs that are better kept as methods (e.g. z.optionalString()). I generally don't like having multiple ways of achieving the same thing.
Also, there will likely be a way to configure this setting globally in Zod 4, which solves the core problem better than z.strictObject() anyway.
In the issue, I also saw that it is "the recommended approach". I just find it weird that it's not recommended anywhere 🤔
cc @vixalien It is the recommended approach for achieving the OP's suggestion of a deepStrict(), not in the general case.
Sure :) Global option would be reaaallyy nice! Thanks for the time, so you on v4 🤘