Cody Born

One of the questions that was brought up in the all-core devs call (by @zviadm I believe), was around the potential impact of improving the availability of attestation services. We'd...

@zviadm @aaronmboyd I'm currently investigating the feasibility of splitting the validator/AS rewards without a hard-fork. If it needed a hard-fork, it'd likely not be on mainnet until Oct 2021.

@nategraf The only reason to have to hardfork is if we're hitting the gas limit for the `distributeEpochPaymentsFromSigner` call and needed to bump it up before adding more complexity. The...

Just sent out a big update to the Attestation Service Incentives design. Appreciate all of the feedback that went into this. @zviadm a lot of this is riffing on your...

Good catch on the PoP. I just realized we already have a method `removeAttestationSigner()` which sets the signer to `address(0)`: https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/d07b9267115255d03174a218d31dee8d29b473b1/packages/protocol/contracts/common/Accounts.sol#L317 My main hesitancy of automatically increasing the reward potential...

cc @mcortesi who had some ideas around an alternative design

It seems like we've reached a good point with CIP32 thanks to all of the feedback. You can find the latest version of the spec published [here](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-proposals/blob/master/CIPs/cip-0032.md). Does anyone have...

Makes sense @YazzyYaz. I see we have a Core Devs 5 this Thursday. Do we have an agenda yet?

Hey @nategraf, apologies for missing the previous comment in the PR. I definitely think this idea is worth discussing, especially in light of the recent Twilio and Valora 1.11 failures....

> First, there is economic cost to malicious behavior because you have to pay for attestation fees, so it isn't just free-for-all. In the case of running Valora on an...