coderofstuff
coderofstuff
> Perhaps a better way to handle this is to move more of `modify_block_template` logic to within consensus where storage mass activation is already accessible and can be checked. It...
For this one, the effective change is that if a block has an unexpected pruning point, it will be marked as `StatusDisqualifiedFromChain`, right? But also, since the check is now...
Changes to apply: - Instead of extra days, allow specifying exactly how many days to keep - Track the history root independent of pruning point
Implemented in https://github.com/kaspanet/rusty-kaspa/pull/654
@KaffinPX this being `--send-all` is probably to match what it used to be in the kaspad go wallet: https://github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/blob/6085d1fc84d71f74a571fad2b7e5b38413a3db5a/cmd/kaspawallet/config.go#L67