Run3-alca247X Add possibility to uncorrect the RecHit energies for AlCaReco tests
PR description:
Add possibility to uncorrect the RecHit energies for AlCaReco tests
PR validation:
Tested by creating the flat trees with uncorrected energies
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Nothing special
cms-bot internal usage
-code-checks
Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44967/40244
- This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
- code-format:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44967/40244/code-format.patch
e.g.
curl -k https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44967/40244/code-format.patch | patch -p1You can also runscram build code-formatto apply code format directly
+code-checks
Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44967/40246
- This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.
It involves the following packages:
- Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos (alca)
@cmsbuild, @consuegs, @saumyaphor4252, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. @mmusich, @tocheng, @rsreds, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here
@cmsbuild Please test
+1
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e0b0c/39368/summary.html
COMMIT: 2d4c720b9e03e485f3ef33d6c607cc7e2ac30563
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-13-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44967/39368/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.
Comparison Summary
Summary:
- You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
- Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
- DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
- DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3339016
- DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
- DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
- DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338990
- DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
- DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
- DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
- Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
- TriggerResults: no differences found
+code-checks
Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44967/40249
- This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository
Pull request #44967 was updated. @saumyaphor4252, @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @consuegs can you please check and sign again.
@cmsbuild Please test
-1
Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e0b0c/39374/summary.html
COMMIT: 8b9fb417d9d7a261d321e599da2ba73b99a723e6
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-13-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44967/39374/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.
RelVals-INPUT
- 4.76
4.76_ZMuSkim2012D/step2_ZMuSkim2012D.log
Comparison Summary
Summary:
- You potentially added 7 lines to the logs
- Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
- DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
- DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3339016
- DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
- DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
- DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338993
- DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
- DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
- DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
- Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
- TriggerResults: no differences found
+alca
- RelValInput error is unrelated
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)
+1
@rappoccio an explicit "merge" is needed here, because of the test failure
merge