cmssw
cmssw copied to clipboard
[14_0_X] Fix for is not a valid DT id error
PR description:
Verbatim backport of https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/44417
type bug-fix
A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for CMSSW_14_0_X.
It involves the following packages:
- L1Trigger/DTTriggerPhase2 (l1, upgrade)
@srimanob, @aloeliger, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald, @battibass, @JanFSchulte this is something you requested to watch as well. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here
- Backported from #44417
cms-bot internal usage
backport of https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/44417
please test
+1
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5c8508/38387/summary.html
COMMIT: 43d1393b42ca9589769c6871fbae49b9775563a3
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-03-25-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/44418/38387/install.sh
to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.
Comparison Summary
Summary:
- You potentially removed 164 lines from the logs
- ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
- Reco comparison results: 29 differences found in the comparisons
- DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
- DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3243082
- DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
- DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
- DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3243060
- DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
- DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
- DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
- Checked 202 log files, 163 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
- TriggerResults: no differences found
+l1
+Upgrade
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)
+1