cfrnet icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cfrnet copied to clipboard

Reported results

Open DavidCohen2 opened this issue 2 years ago • 1 comments

Hi,

I ran the simulation using the provided configuration and observed results that appear to differ from the results reported in your paper. Despite my efforts to investigate the cause of this discrepancy, I have been unable to determine why these results differ.

I have used the following configuration:

p_alpha=[0.3] p_lambda=[1e-4] n_in=[3] n_out=[3] nonlin='elu' lrate=[1e-3] batch_size=[100] dim_in=[200] dim_out=[100] batch_norm=[0] normalization=['divide'] imb_fun=['wass'] experiments=1000 reweight_sample=[1] split_output=[1] rep_weight_decay=[0] dropout_in=1.0 dropout_out=1.0 rbf_sigma=0.1 lrate_decay=0.97 decay=0.3 optimizer='Adam' wass_lambda=10.0 wass_iterations=10 wass_bpt=1 use_p_correction=0 iterations=3000 weight_init=[0.1] outdir='results/example_ihdp' datadir='data/' dataform='ihdp_npci_1-1000.train.npz' data_test='ihdp_npci_1-1000.test.npz' pred_output_delay=200 loss='l2' sparse=0 varsel=0 repetitions=1 val_part=0.3

and I got the following results:

Mode: Train | Pehe | Bias_ate | Rmse_fact | Rmse_cfact | Rmse_ite | Objective | Pehe_nn

0 | 0.785 +/- 0.052 | 0.219 +/- 0.031 | 1.135 +/- 0.045 | 1.188 +/- 0.020 | 1.164 +/- 0.021 | 0.994 +/- 0.036 | 4.895 +/- 0.613

Mode: Valid | Pehe | Bias_ate | Rmse_fact | Rmse_cfact | Rmse_ite | Objective | Pehe_nn

0 | 0.884 +/- 0.084 | 0.224 +/- 0.031 | 1.363 +/- 0.091 | 1.206 +/- 0.032 | 1.201 +/- 0.032 | 1.995 +/- 0.402 | 5.661 +/- 0.799

Mode: Test | Pehe | Bias_ate | Rmse_fact | Rmse_cfact | Rmse_ite | Pehe_nn

0 | 0.833 +/- 0.056 | 0.236 +/- 0.032 | 1.287 +/- 0.065 | 1.182 +/- 0.024 | 1.183 +/- 0.022 | 5.456 +/- 0.682

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response.

DavidCohen2 avatar Mar 03 '23 05:03 DavidCohen2

我也出现了这种情况

Zyx6666 avatar Jan 23 '24 12:01 Zyx6666