Clementine icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
Clementine copied to clipboard

Add extra filebrowser presentations

Open Clementine-Issue-Importer opened this issue 10 years ago • 18 comments

From aceler on May 10, 2010 20:42:35

Today clementine have only one presentation of the files — a list. Whan you have a lots of files and directories, it is not sufficient.

It can be useful for the users to create an ability to switch between several filebrowser presentations like "table", "icon view", "list view" and maybe other options.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/issues/detail?id=301

From john.maguire on August 09, 2010 06:53:36

Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Component-UI

From ojirio on August 11, 2010 05:36:20

Yes if would be really good if clementine had proper file browser with detailed view, allowing you to sort directories by name, modification date, size etc (maybe even artist, album, genre, if there is some fast id3 tags reading library)

From JPS010374 on October 04, 2010 07:42:10

and perhaps something like Cover-Flow ;-) it IS often a killer-argument for some people to choose one media-player over another...

From davidsansome on October 04, 2010 08:34:25

http://www.tuaw.com/2010/10/04/ouch-apple-dinged-for-208-5-million-in-patent-infringement-cas/ I don't think we'll be implementing cover flow :)

From JPS010374 on October 04, 2010 23:41:54

hmm, ok so this is the reason i hate patents. they block every development and improvement... i understand your point ;-) btw, i love Clementine! also without CoverFlow ;-)

From ivanovnegro on December 23, 2010 21:00:05

For me cover flow would be the killer argument in a negative way to choose a player, I dislike the idea and mostly when it would be implemented the way to slow down the application.

From davidsansome on January 13, 2011 09:56:34

Issue 1285 has been merged into this issue.

From davidsansome on January 20, 2011 08:22:59

Issue 1334 has been merged into this issue.

From legion1978 on February 11, 2011 08:12:34

uhhh in that article (and after some diggin') i can see that its most likely a fraudulent complaint/ruling... and i really doubt Apple would go chase anyone using that particular interface.. specially after the somewhat failure of M$ on the menu/desktop matter.. (the technology is not being copied, but the idea if anything.. and ideas are free..)

In terms of usability it might actually help, but in my case its not the preferred way to browse, although i do use it on nautilus elementary.. i think eyecandy may attract in fact some users :) and I can definetly see a nice clem-flow in a full screen party mode :D so... i know u plainly said "I don't think we'll be implementing cover flow :)" but im tempted to open an [new]issue nevertheles...

ty

From davidsansome on March 31, 2011 06:25:09

Issue 1675 has been merged into this issue.

From tr33.org.uk on August 02, 2011 10:13:18

so, where are we at with this? The file browser - more than a year later - still doesn't have any extra features. Or does it? Am I missing something?

A simple click option to expand the tree - like in most file browsers - would already be very useful. As far as I am concerned, it would be enough improvement.

From vruiz.jurado on November 14, 2011 05:19:00

In Amarok 1.4 a usually used the creation date in inverse sort order to see my music. This is usuful to listen to the last album you added. But in clementine I don't fine nothing similar.

From davidsansome on January 18, 2012 13:49:52

Issue 2630 has been merged into this issue.

From kaozmotic on March 06, 2012 07:43:00

How can this feature request still be low priority after almost two years? Is it a big thing to add standard file browser capabilities to Clementine?

Like mentioned in Comment 12, who: "used the creation date in inverse sort order to see my music. This is usuful to listen to the last album you added."

Since there already is a file browser..... then... could there not be...

From arnaud.bienner on March 06, 2012 08:07:47

@kaozmotic: It's sill low priority because it's still not so important from our point of view, and that developers have others (more interesting IMHO) things to work on (note that the status is still New, and not Accepted). If it's really important for you, you can have a look to the code and provide us a patch. We would be glad to review it and, hopefully, integrate it :) Otherwise, it's useless to add extra comments to request an enhancement request to be implemented: it will not make the developers implement it faster :p Just star the issue, it's enough ;)

From davidsansome on September 11, 2012 06:21:39

Issue 3154 has been merged into this issue.

Impossible to find new folders by date. it terribly infuriates. Seriously, is it so difficult to add sorting by name and date at least?

punik avatar May 07 '20 09:05 punik

Tree view on files would be really nice.

ghost avatar May 26 '22 12:05 ghost