3DDFA Why not use original BFM model?

I find that the 3DDFA model is based on the simple BFM model. Does it make model more fast and less accurancy?

Jun 03 '20 08:06 CodingMice

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face.

Jun 10 '20 08:06 CodingMice

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face.

do you have the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

Jul 02 '20 00:07 moonshine90

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face. If convenient，could you share the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

Jul 18 '20 15:07 UestcJay

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face.

do you have the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

Hello, I also want to see the result with shape+exp param(60+29), Does you get the lable?

Oct 28 '20 12:10 taojianglong

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face.

do you have the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

You can generate it with simple BFM model (60+29)

Nov 05 '20 11:11 CodingMice

I found that if shape + exp param is (60+29), it will has bad results in some side face.

do you have the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

You can generate it with simple BFM model (60+29) could you share the label which shape + exp param is (60+29)?

Jan 10 '21 08:01 zhaofang216