Claudio André
Claudio André
Yes ``` OpenSSL library version: 01010100f OpenSSL 1.1.1 11 Sep 2018 ```
> I wanted to link with ld.lld but meanwhile I realized that it's safer to call the linker through clang. In this case, the best option would be to overwrite...
* IMO: I think you could propose a patch that does what you believe is right for us to test (I, for example, can't imagine what would be best). At...
> How about we drop `x86_64` from the `case` statement? What worries me is Solaris on X86 but it works fine (tested). I don't expect problems in any other CI...
Thanks for reporting. I'm afraid I cannot reproduce this using latest bleeding **`Jumbo`**, but I can if I use the latest stable (john proper) version: ``` commit d747b444654ef9454fd193b449aeb5f4c1091b28 (HEAD ->...
IMO, we should tag something as Jumbo 2 (this being a maintenance release with known bugs). **** We don't need to use the 'old school' release process for evolving (maintenance)...
> I guess you'll update `src/packaging/build.sh` in here next? Thanks! Yes. Probably I'll remove it from here (it belongs to the `*-packages` repository). I can remove it now or create...
I didn't find anything in the documentation (and it makes sense): it's more like a starting point or a blueprint for packagers. In that case, keeping the .desktop and flatpak...
Thanks for your bug report. This looks like an obscure bug in the gpg format as stated in cracker.c: ``` * We should have already called fmt_self_test() from john.c. This...
I was also able to reproduce. And failed to understand how could it be db != db.