Schema: Schizophrenic renaming style

[matyaskopp]

We have two styles of renaming:

1. person renaming: https://github.com/clarin-eric/ParlaMint/blob/5deaeed5ae792f3ba1726072298885b5b64a6d64/Data/ParlaMint-AT/ParlaMint-AT-listPerson.xml#L76-L77
2. org renaming https://github.com/clarin-eric/ParlaMint/blob/a3cb2ecee74cd8925b0aa37831812703638c7b4e/Data/ParlaMint-HU/ParlaMint-HU-listOrg.xml#L632-L635

To be honest, I like more the first solution because it probably reflects better reality.

I know it is probably too late to change this...

@TomazErjavec, what do you think? What was the reason for adding renaming as a relation between organizations?

[TomazErjavec]

I like more the first solution because it probably reflects better reality.

I agree, it is also simpler.

I know it is probably too late to change this...

Maybe - I am considering if we should for 3.1 implement a script like v30tov31 that would implement systematic changes where we consider them to be beneficial. The partners could change their own corpus if they want to, otherwise we do it for them. But you never liked this approach, so... Anyway, we can discuss it after 3.0 is published.

What was the reason for adding renaming as a relation between organizations?

This goes all the way back to sloParl and Andrej Pančur's decision to do it this way, and was simply carried on from there.

[matyaskopp]

ok, I will use the old style in ParlaMint-UA and we can change it later.

[TomazErjavec]

Moving this to future.