Charlie Koven

Hi all, thanks for continuing this discussion. @lawrencepj1 you list out the state data but I'm curious about the relative pros and cons of using the transitions data rather than...

Also, we should probably include the info from the LUMIP `added-tree-cover` file as well, so that we can start thinking about how to handle afforestation in FATES ? Or is...

Thanks @lawrencepj1, could you say more what you mean by >The gross changes would have to be maintained as the dataset was regridded to different resolutions by mksrf which may...

@lawrencepj1 I was thinking more about how FATES will actually process this info, and had a few other questions that you would know the answers to: 1. Is the assumption...

Thanks @lawrencepj1, that is very helpful!

Woot! Thanks @glemieux @samsrabin @ekluzek @adrifoster

> Per FATES software development meeting today, @ckoven noted that we should hold off on testing this due to a potential bug in the FATES-side NBP diagnostic. I've sorted out...

Yes this will require adding the new state and transition field names in both CTSM and FATES: - [CTSM code](https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/blob/master/src/dyn_subgrid/dynFATESLandUseChangeMod.F90#L32-L93) - [FATES code](https://github.com/NGEET/fates/blob/main/biogeochem/FatesLandUseChangeMod.F90#L44-L51) I'm currently downloading the CMIP7 files, I...

> FWIW, the preprocessed data from Peter that are going into our surface datasets and landuse time series can be found here `/glade/campaign/cesm/development/lmwg/landuse_source_data/CTSM53CMIP7RawData/` I don't have access to that directory...

OK I just took a look at the luh3 files. I had downloaded the 3.0 version, and assuming the 3.1 isn't too different (i.e. that it also has all zeros...