Charles Kerr

> Click "Verify local data" after manually adding an incomplete task is the solution i am using now. But I think explicitly add the "skip verify" option will be approaching...

Is this still happening in 4.0.2?

At least for ret=-1 errno 0, we can probably just silence that one. I don't think it's indicative of a larger problem. > Edit: By the way, is there a...

It's message-log. Possible string values: ``` { "critical", TR_LOG_CRITICAL }, { "debug", TR_LOG_DEBUG }, { "error", TR_LOG_ERROR }, { "info", TR_LOG_INFO }, { "off", TR_LOG_OFF }, { "trace", TR_LOG_TRACE },...

> They initiated the connection but failed to respond before the rto. A malicious client can also spoof the destination address of a ST_SYN bringing us to this state. I'm...

> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /Users/User/Developer/transmission/third-party/libutp/utp_internal.cpp:2574:77 in /Users/User/Developer/transmission/third-party/libutp/utp_internal.cpp:2574:77: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x000106f5c504 for type 'UTPSocket *', which requires 8 byte alignment 0x000106f5c504: note: pointer points here f1 3a...

I don't know what the state of it is. We've had a handful of PRs in limbo @ https://github.com/bittorrent/libutp/pulls for awhile now. Maybe @ghazel would know?

> 2022-12-01 14:13:21 +0000 peer-mgr.cc:1066 [Debug] ______________________: setting [78.57.55.34]:52300 do_purge flag because we got an ERANGE, EMSGSIZE, or ENOTCONN error That one's probably worth opening a separate ticket for. IDK...

@GaryElshaw I’m mostly just interested to the extent that it builds more smoothly with Transmission. I don’t want to take on any maintenance responsibilities for a public-facing fork

@ZorroGuevara could you rephrase the suggestion?