Christopher Rowley
Christopher Rowley
`juliapkg-dev.json` is not relevant here - that is simply to force PythonCall and JuliaCall to both be working from the same local version while developing those packages. However yes you're...
Yeah I've had the same issue. For me, `juliaup self upgrade` didn't do anything, and I can't install the newest JuliaUp through the Windows App Store either, but assuming that's...
FYI the behaviour here has changed a little recently. Now if you have JuliaUp installed, JuliaPkg will select the version to install from the list of available versions given by...
This is not a bug, it's a documented feature. If you want JuliaPkg to leave the project alone, you can set `PYTHON_JULIAPKG_OFFLINE=yes`. However a missing feature I am aware of...
The current assumption in JuliaPkg is that it "owns" the project that it uses, and is therefore free to add and remove packages as it requires to satisfy any dependencies....
I'm aware of it but last time I looked it was mainly targeted at interactive usage. In particular it did stuff like messing with your PATH and/or .bashrc file and...
Can you be more explicit in how to reproduce? I.e. give a sequence of commands specifying exactly how you set up the environment and are invoking python/jupyter. My immediate thought...
I cannot reproduce your issue by following those steps. Can you compare `juliapkg.state.STATE` and `juliapkg.deps.deps_files()` between python and jupyter?
It's now released.
> This is half a feature request and half a request for comment on my current solution. For the RFC side, I think that if what you have works OK...