Christopher Jacoby
Christopher Jacoby
I don't have a good sense of what is trying to be achieved with this one. Unlike #116 and #110, I think this one has a slightly higher probability of...
My 2¢: I think that 1 is much cleaner, and allows us to punt these sort of decisions to the "application developer". This is key: > All metadata becomes application...
I actually had a think about this yesterday; one way to update the `active` instances would be "event"-based callback functions, given to the "original" Mux, somewhat Keras-like in style. If...
I'll prototype this in a gist in the next day or two and try to see if what I'm thinking actually makes any sense / works the way I think...
Agreed 👌. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:01 PM Brian McFee wrote: > @cjacoby Thanks -- keep me posted. This > might be the last blocker on 2.0, so...
Okay! I did some homework. I didn't do it for mux yet, just for the base Streamer class, but for proof of concept, I think it does the thing. Please...
Roger that; I am pro keeping 2.0 reasonable so we can get it out the door.
I've done some work with asyncio recently. ...HAMR project?
Happy do that, if we agree on specs/design/a plan/vision.
Okay, I did some homework and spent some time understanding how mux works. Can you talk a bit about: 1. What the objective of these changes are? 2. How you...