Ciarán Hanrahan

@asadath1395 are you referring to the Global settings for "Limit future booking" & "Buffers" from [here](https://www.figma.com/file/UajFu4M1APhn2AywAEJkJr/New-Features?node-id=5961%3A540950&mode=dev)? If so, you can ignore those and just implement the "Limit booking frequency" [here](https://www.figma.com/file/UajFu4M1APhn2AywAEJkJr/New-Features?node-id=5961%3A547501&mode=dev)....

@asadath1395 great thank you 🙏 from a design point of view, the others are ready. I will however just create separate issues for them and get a review from other...

 We do have designs for features related to this so will definitely make it onto the roadmap.

This was removed because it was being abused. We can add this back by adding a verification email when creating the workflow (like we do with SMS) cc @CarinaWolli @shirazdole

~Is this better than landing them on the assignment tab?~ Updated

Thank you for all that @fluctuat. I'm adding the "needs approval" label as I will break the requests up into individual issues.

> If you try to exit out of an event type without assigning anyone... It should only throw this modal when you go to leave the entire event type, not...

> Tested this and worked fine but it swaps both the event types instead of moving only one. is this fine @ciaranha? No, this is weird. I'm sure the fact...

I'd like for us to have a specific draggable area rather than the whole thing draggable as re-ordering is not a super high need, but in terms of the interaction,...

@CarinaWolli would [this pr](https://github.com/calcom/cal.com/pull/14864) have resolved this issue?