Cameron Hummels
Cameron Hummels
@matthewturk I think all that remains to be done for this PR is the addition of an answer test or two using the dataset that is already being used in...
It appears that the change was already made by @lpsinger in commit [3ef76fcb](https://github.com/astropy/astroplan/commit/3ef76fcb) on Dec 3, 2018. However, that version is not in the PyPI release, so anyone who pip...
Despite this bug being fixed in the dev version of the code, I think we should leave this issue open until the bugfix gets pushed to PyPI, otherwise more people...
Yeah, that's pretty sensible. The reason I'm asking about a new PyPI version is that I'm assembling a bunch of notebooks for an international school on time-domain astro for the...
Yeah, I realize I could put the github dev version in the requirements file, but it isn't so much a package that we're having the students install, but just a...
That's pretty sweet it gives all this feedback! Much better than the PEP8 tests failing and then you have to look through the test outputs to figure out what went...
 No, not linearly increasing. In this simulation, the grids are for the most part nested around the galaxy with discrete transitions, whereas the smoothing length not so much.
But it does illustrate that the smoothing lengths are ~10x larger than the dx values, hence the really washed out structure in the final image.
Yes, a bit, but it becomes increasingly long processing time. For references, the number of grid elements in the original dataset is 3.6e6. Here are the results of various different...