chuggafan

Results 226 comments of chuggafan

I haven't seen any Source Annotation Library (SAL) annotations used anywhere in our code, unless you remove or `#define` away the SAL stuff this won't compile by default.

I've seen similar experiences. If you want to fix this temporarily (You can also send these patches into CMake directly and save some trouble): ```cmake set(CMAKE_CXX17_STANDARD_COMPILE_OPTION "-std=c++17") set(CMAKE_CXX17_EXTENSION_COMPILE_OPTION "-std=c++17") set(CMAKE_CXX17_STANDARD_HAS_FULL_SUPPORT...

We don't have a `libatomic` outright but do support some gcc atomic features and all(?) C11/C++11 atomic features. I'm unsure of what would need to be changed but I don't...

I think a raw `-j` should basically be a "last ditch you have an infinite number of computers at your beck and call and something like distcc" move, when I...

I don't think this is a failure with libcxx, if I use x86-64 clang 10.0.0 (which uses libcxx of the same version) on godbolt I get a successful compile https://godbolt.org/z/nc8W4E36P...

I'm not sure this has to do with is_function because if I do a quick checkthrough of "is_function or __is_function" throughout the file `` it turns up absolutely nothing, and...

As far as I am aware, the plan is the next release will be after C++17 support is finalized, possibly with finalized C23 support, I am assuming I'm correct @LADSoft,...

Well, it looks like v707 has a .exe installer uploaded, so perhaps the latest trick worked?

BTW, current tests (on C++14 mode) are breaking in various ways with miscompilations (stack displayed errors) and compiler faults. I suspect the compiler faults will be rooted out with #572...

So, I've made my 2fa stuff using some TOTP tools. Anyways: There's plenty of functions that aren't implemented atm, e.g. the aforementioned erf (Oh hey, someone's implementation based off of...