chtenb

> One could imagine a re-parent function, though it would take a fair amount of bookkeeping. You could simulate this by cloning the subgraph where you want it, and then...

Should the function `agrename` be exposed in a PR, or is it considered too unsafe?

This issue overlaps with https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1068

There is an open PR for this: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/7215 You can merge it in your own fork and compile from source if you're interested in this feature.

Thanks for the reply! I see, so if I understand correctly, all of the equalities that equate two `InputFilter`s should be interpreted as though they are put through `matches`, like...

That leaves one more question: if our QuickSpec properties are always just concerned with observational equality (which makes sense to me), why bother with pattern matching on e.g. `FlipH` in...

 This looks like it says `12`, but it's actually `l2`

I just re-ran the workflow in the reproduction PR for you, and still the same error occurs: https://github.com/Rubjerg/Graphviz.NetWrapper/pull/33/checks?check_run_id=2465253939 You should be able to reproduce by checking out that PR which...

On github the build action reports: ``` > Run msbuild Rubjerg.Graphviz.sln /p:Configuration=Release Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 16.9.0+5e4b48a27 for .NET Framework Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. ```

@v-codyguan It looks like you forgot to pass the test.dll to the testrunner. The full test command of step 4 should be: ``` packages\nunit.consolerunner\3.12.0\tools\nunit3-console.exe Rubjerg.Graphviz.Test\bin\x64\Debug\net48\Rubjerg.Graphviz.Test.dll ``` Otherwise your steps look...