Christian Brabandt

I'll have a look, but cannot promise to come to this anytime soon.

can you please test #18104 ?

that's because that particular PR hasn't been merged yet. That's why I asked you specifically to test PR #18104

You need to be patient here. We don't have a shell syntax maintainer currently

please show the complete `:version` output

okay so it is using the stable ABI. Is this a recent regression?

Hm, I don't understand the stack trace and don't know how to fix this

@audriusk can you compile and test without the stable ABI please?

am i the only one, who cannot watch the video? It says corrupted

The vim syntax is quite complex, especially since adding Vim9 support and is quite closely related to the actual Vim source code. I had a quick look, but while similar...