chris-belcher

The email/PM i sent out is only for the part of the coinjoin bounty that joinmarket-so-far gets. Other parts of the coinjoin bounty will likely be left in the multisig...

Could BlockchainInterface.query_utxo_set() be used to tell whether a utxo has already been spent and therefore it's commitment can be deleted?

Could there be a timeout, a commitment is banned only for (say) 2 months and then deleted from disk? It would still provide a massive rate limiting to a spy.

I agree with the displaying of miner fee contribution in the manual choosing of orders. Also agree with displaying miner fee contribution in the "chosen orders to fill" message. Neutral/disagree...

Taker could use the maker tx fee contribution to choose between them, so provide pressure to keep the fee up. Trouble is the taker doesn't know how many inputs the...

Fundamentally the problem is that takers want their tx to confirm quicker than makers do. I initially thought makers would also want fast confirmations because they want their money to...

Sure, makers can offset their lower miner fee contribution by charging less for their coinjoin. In that situation the taker's `tx fee floor` option will be used to make sure...

Isn't that advantage of maker advertising a minimum fee is also there right now with makers advertising their tx fee contribution? and would be there with advertising their fee/kB ?

What do you mean by the first part? I didn't understand. If they contribute to miner fees they contribute to miner fees. Coinjoin fees are orthogonal. I hope the second...

> what we're calling maker contributions are in actuality contributed by the taker Why? When you do the accounting it comes out of the maker's utxos. The second part may...