Christian Bertsch

FMI design meeting: Klaus: With the GUI of fmusim, the repo has further grown, it would be better to split (general agreement)

For me the requirement for displaying the results are the following: - in a top-level view it should be simple (e.g. not displaying all tool versions separately) - users expect...

This would indeed be an ideal case for "ReferenceFMUs" not exported by a commercial tool, but with the expectation that every tool can simulate them correctly (or explain why start...

I do not think the displayed results are absurd, but perhaps they need to be better explained (and the displayed numbers perhaps reconsidered). Exporting and importing tool vendors can upload...

The current provided information is not useless, but has to be better explained. It is very beneficial if tool vendors upload results for different (and latest) versions of their tools...

Are internal variables allowed as reference results or only outputs? In some importing tools I would not know how to get internal varibles (if the importing toolbox would not have...

> Let's do this What exactly did we decide in Regensburg? Should we add a sentence to the rules that we allow all kinds of variables (if that was decided?)...

Yes, please close.

I would close the issue and perhaps add somethere (where?) a comment on the XC-rules document , that there do not yet exist released reference FMUs.

@nickbattle : Thanks! IMHO this is a case where it is great to have a checker that is very strict to provide a warning, but we should not remove these...