chochem

Results 253 comments of chochem

basalt could make sense though as that was added in vanilla in later versions. so that would be based on lava+soul sand+packed ice maybe.

duplicate of https://github.com/GTNewHorizons/GT-New-Horizons-Modpack/issues/14621 but I guess its closed

both points seem to be about boots of the meteor, not nanochestplace

got around to some testing. Alveary with 2 estims (4x gold). and oblivion frame for white (wintry+diligent): all bees mutate, it really is 100%. I am at 60/60 genes, I...

ok for anyone else wanting to test it, the post just really messed up the examples. Just try Green Bee for example instead.

no, rp1 should not be a checkbox. However, you can already bypass it if you make cbd. Are you sure you are up-to-date? ![image](https://github.com/GTNewHorizons/GT-New-Horizons-Modpack/assets/40274384/eae0a799-d911-4e20-af30-be180bb4dcf7)

> ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/30978504/300274836-de2f29f7-be0a-454e-9775-830980417cea.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Q1FqkZ20OO52NMKfOkH7111wd_gcEXsbuhGo4ZWESvc) The quest `Busy Bees Buzzing Boldly`, describe of the water in the `Hygroregulator`, that **010%** should be **-10%** already fixed

the diamond spike needs a lathe

> * [ ] Quest "Tools of the Trade" (get Network tool and Network visualisation tool) depends on quest "Need More Information?" (get Advanced network tool). That's incorrect. > ![2024-02-28_17...