Christian

That sounds really strange to me. I will have a look.

Hi, extracting the server from the core library is already planned for 3.1.x (but this might be not released released next summer). I am wondering where the "tons" of dependencies...

Closing this for now because this change is planned but this will not happen soon.

The method is now renamed because it never published anything in the past. This was misleading. It just puts the message into an internal queue and it is being published...

This is indeed something I read a couple of times now. I will have a look if there is a possible dead lock in the managed client. Are you able...

I will not approve this pull request because in my opinion this is not the right decision. In my opinion I forgot the null check for the parameter. So that...

Do you mean Client or Server? The library supports all QoS levels. Do you have more details about what you are missing or do not understand?

I will add samples soon. But in general all QoS levels are "supported". The ting is that you need to store QoS level 1 and 2 messages on your own...

@JanEggers Could you please have a look if here is something to do?

Closing this due to inactivity.