WIP: Use FZF backend instead

[chardskarth]

Regardng #23, I haven't thought of a way to support FZF and ended up using fzf as the backend instead.

[mingsu]

@chardskarth Thanks for your work, I want to try your branch, can you tell me how install your branch, before merge it into the main.

Thanks.

[chardskarth]

@mingsu hi there! I don't recommend merging this to main. I took a very different approach.

Feel free to try my branch. Go ahead and clone and do a "make install" there. You should be able to build it.

[mingsu]

@mingsu hi there! I don't recommend merging this to main. I took a very different approach.

Feel free to try my branch. Go ahead and clone and do a "make install" there. You should be able to build it.

Thanks for your reply. I tried to build it, without success. Can you provide a binary so that I can try?

[justgook]

for me worked just by calling make and everything builds successfully

but works not really like fzf: (all commands call from root of this repo) ls | fzf - and type "rm"

ls | choose - and type "rm"

for me, it looks like if there is no 100% (sequence of letters, then we got nothing) Example that works:

[chardskarth]

Hi @justgook thanks for the review 🙏

but I won't be working on this (at least not anytime soon). It works for my use case.

Feel free to fork and remove "--exact" option.. or even better, you can add changes in this MR. Thanks again!