http-proxy-middleware
http-proxy-middleware copied to clipboard
websocket proxy cannot upgrade websocket connection
Expected behavior
HPM should upgrade websocket requests always
Actual behavior
HPM websocket proxy cannot upgrade websocket connections sporadically
Setup
- http-proxy-middleware: 0.17.1
- server: tornado 4.4.1 - Tornado Github
- webpack: 1.13.2
- webpack-dev-server: 1.16.1
proxy middleware configuration
devServer: {
proxy: {
'/hyperguard/websocket/*': {
target: 'ws://localhost:8082',
ws: true
}
}
}
server mounting
def serve_forever(self):
app = self.__make_app()
self.__http_server = HTTPServer(app)
self.__http_server._handle_connection = self._handle_connection
self.__http_server.listen(self.__port, self.__host)
app.ssl_enabled = self.__ssl_options is not None
self.__ioloop.start()
Howto Reproduce
http stream request
GET /hyperguard/websocket HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8079
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
origin: http://localhost:8079
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Key: yrOcNHCvvVuGgttYgv9nzA==
Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Upgrade: websocket
http stream response getting this response only sometimes, if not the websocket connection never be established
HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
upgrade: websocket
connection: Upgrade
sec-websocket-accept: I3u4B7iakSJWk4yLd02hfn+enus=
- that issue also occurs on different platforms (fedora 22, ubuntu 14.04, centos7)
- restarting webpack-dev-server doesnt change anything
Thanks for reporting.
Can you provide info on the websocket client(s) you are using. And the frequency of the upgrade requests?
_.debounce
is used to solve an issue: #57. Maybe that explains the sporadic behaviour when concurrent upgrade requests are made.
https://github.com/chimurai/http-proxy-middleware/blob/0cb6839ed2121f7dc8685f31a1e18b5069eeb092/lib/index.js#L15
Can you try to remove the debounce code and see if it solves the issue?
From:
var wsUpgradeDebounced = _.debounce(handleUpgrade);
To:
var wsUpgradeDebounced = handleUpgrade;
We are using the websocket client implementation of Chrome(53.0.2785.116 m (64-bit)) and Firefox (47.0). Frequency: I try to establish only one connection on initialisation. Nothing changed on removing the debounce code.
Just to confirm if the issue is related to HPM. Did you try to connect to the server directly? (without the proxy)
If is it HPM related; It can be either an issue in HPM configuration or a bug in HPM.
Try adding the option: changeOrigin: true
Tornado might be refusing the request, since Host
value in the request is different from the Tornado's host.
devServer: {
proxy: {
'/hyperguard/websocket/*': {
target: 'ws://localhost:8082',
changeOrigin: true,
ws: true
}
}
}
Direct connection
I think the issue is related to HPM, because if i request a websocket upgrade directly it always works as expected.
request (without HPM)
GET /hyperguard/websocket HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8082
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
Origin: https://localhost:8082
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Key: 7XjMl4KmXDJa/TWfb7vabQ==
Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Upgrade: websocket
immediatlely response (without HPM)
HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
Upgrade: websocket
Connection: Upgrade
Sec-WebSocket-Accept: iC7Eh/cX6YgchA7mJQ950DWmIiQ=
Workaround
I figured out a way to reproduce a workaround with tornado + HPM + webpack-dev-server. If the problem occurs i just have to request the websocket proxy path via http e.g http://localhost:8079/hyperguard/websocket
response
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
X-Powered-By: Express
Content-Length: 34
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:13:38 GMT
Server: TornadoServer/4.4.1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: keep-alive
Can "Upgrade" only to "WebSocket".
If i go back to my working url e.g. http://localhost:8079 the websocket connection can be upgraded as expected.
Q&R
- Adding changeOrigin option has no effect.
- Tornado actually allows alternate origins.
Can you try setting your target with the http
protocol:
target: 'http://localhost:8082'
Changing the protocol of the target option has no effect. I have to debug the issue in-depth. It cannot be excluded that the problem occures on tornados side.
Think I've exhausted the common configurations. :)
FYI:
HPM uses http-proxy
to do the actual proxying. (https://github.com/nodejitsu/node-http-proxy)
Worth checking to see if you'll get the same issue when you're just using http-proxy
.
It looks like I get this with webpack-dev-server 1.16.2 also. I get this on the server:
[HPM] GET /websocket -> ws://localhost:8080/websocket
[HPM] Upgrading to WebSocket
Chrome reports:
(index):37 WebSocket connection to 'ws://127.0.0.1:8888/websocket' failed: Connection closed before receiving a handshake response
When using Fiddler it reports:
[Fiddler] ReadResponse() failed: The server did not return a complete response for this request. Server returned 0 bytes.
I'm using a similar config:
proxy: {
'/websocket': {
ws: true,
target: 'ws://localhost:8080/websocket',
logLevel: 'debug'
}
}
One thing I do see which hasn't been reported before is nothing happens if I perform raw websocket connection on a cold start, it just hangs. I only get the above output if I first attempt a basic GET
to http://127.0.0.1:8888/websocket
first which appears to warm-up HPM. I have tried connecting directly to
ws://localhost:8080/websocket
and it does work, I've also tried changing ws://
to http://
to no avail.
The closest issue I've found in the http-proxy
repo is nodejitsu/node-http-proxy#577 but it's really old. nodejitsu/node-http-proxy#891 might also be related. I've also raised this on StackOverflow.
@dansiviter, could you try to change your target
to ws://localhost:8080
? AFAIK the path /websocket
already gets appended (unless you use the pathRewrite
option).
Thanks, one step closer as that worked. However, I still need to warm up the connection with a GET
before it'll connect. Any ideas?
For anyone who needs it my config is:
proxy: {
'/websocket': {
ws: true,
target: 'http://localhost:8080'
}
}
Which ultimately proxies to ws://localhost:8080/websocket
so appending the path and changing the scheme automatically.
debugged that problem weeks ago rudimentary, it seems that the http proxy middleware which is applied to the express server never be executed. maybe a side effect with sockjs which is used to handle the hot realoading websocket channel.
@dansiviter this SO answer might be helpful: http://stackoverflow.com/a/32943389/465887
I'm working on enabling websocket proxying in Create React App (https://github.com/facebookincubator/create-react-app/issues/1013) and it looks like I can manually watch for the "upgrade" request coming from the devServer, and then call HPM's "upgrade" function.
CRA is using HPM directly though, instead of the devServer.proxy
config, so it might not apply to your use case, but this is the code I'm using to set it up (so far it seems to be working but I haven't tested thoroughly yet):
// Pass the scope regex both to Express and to the middleware for proxying
// of both HTTP and WebSockets to work without false positives.
var hpm = httpProxyMiddleware(pathname => mayProxy.test(pathname), {
target: proxy,
logLevel: 'debug',
onError: onProxyError(proxy),
secure: false,
changeOrigin: true,
ws: true
});
devServer.use(mayProxy, hpm);
devServer.listeningApp.on('upgrade', hpm.upgrade);
I had problems with the proxy websocket closing right after connecting. Found out that socket io was closing unhandled requests. If you are using socket io, the fix is to set the destroyUpgrade option to false:
var express = require('express');
var app = express();
var http = require('http').Server(app);
var proxy = require('http-proxy-middleware');
var io = require('socket.io')(http, {destroyUpgrade: false});
Also seeing this issue. @mixxen's fix seems to have worked for me.
Apologies for commenting on an ancient ticket, but I managed to hit this issue (ws proxy only starts working after manually performing a GET call).
app.use(
'/ws/live',
createProxyMiddleware({
target: process.env.API,
ws: true, // enable websocket proxy
changeOrigin: true,
logLevel : 'debug'
})
);
... "http-proxy-middleware": "^1.0.6", "react": "^17.0.1", "react-scripts": "4.0.0", ....
I understand that no resolution was found, but does anyone know any workaround (better than manually doing a GET, I mean)?
Same here. AFAIU issue on the middleware happens if server is trying to send data socket which has already been closed, but I haven't dig it enough yet. I'll try to find more details, just wanted to underline that issue persists in some conditions.
Got stuck with this issue in my CRA app. I have changed my setupProxy.js
to the following and It looks like it's working for me:
app.use(
'/',
createProxyMiddleware('/ws', {
target: process.env.API,
changeOrigin: true,
secure: false,
ws: true,
})
);
So that the request to React App itself works as a "first manual GET" for the WebSocket (it actually registers the "upgrade" handler)
Got stuck with this issue in my CRA app. I have changed my
setupProxy.js
to the following and It looks like it's working for me:app.use( '/', createProxyMiddleware('/ws', { target: process.env.API, changeOrigin: true, secure: false, ws: true, }) );
So that the request to React App itself works as a "first manual GET" for the WebSocket.
I am not entirely sure how this works... but it does! Thank you for sharing this workaround!
@torrejonv from my understanding it works like lazy loading. Until you make a request to the route where proxy middleware is registered there will be no "upgrade" handler added to the HTTP server. With this ☝️ approach, any request passes through the proxy middleware so that we have the "upgrade" handler registered from the very beginning.
@torrejonv from my understanding it works like lazy loading. Until you make a request to the route where proxy middleware is registered there will be no "upgrade" handler added to the HTTP server. With this ☝️ approach, any request passes through the proxy middleware so that we have the "upgrade" handler registered from the very beginning.
Thank you for the explanation. Very ingenious indeed!