Ches Martin

Thank you @andrewrembrandt, sorry for the long silence here. I use our integrated ctags + Tagbar definitions, I still have a `ctags` binary on my machines that is Exuberant Ctags....

Thank you for the suggestion @masatake, we can try making our current long names compatible (whitespace-free) and using description for the "pretty" names—the change you suggest. I'm certainly happy if...

@andrewrembrandt if you're still on the line, would you like to try the change @masatake suggested without `--kinddef`? We'll also need to update the Tagbar mapping for the changed names.

He added a custom line of config to get imports to fold automatically, but when vim-scala is active for `scala` filetype that custom syntax rule doesn't work. I can replicate...

I _think_ we can fix this plus some other annoying spellchecks like function parameter names by just adding `syn spell notoplevel` to the plugin's syntax definition, with no adverse effects...

Can still reproduce this on current master, so I'll re-open.

I don't use view specs, but I'm also seeing this problem with helper specs -- route helpers not being available. I'm not sure, but digging into it just a little,...

> I'm not a laywer, so it'd be nice to get some legal advice on this before adding a license and merging things. As a side note: [ack.vim added a...

FWIW, ack.vim [had this feature and removed it because of problems](https://github.com/mileszs/ack.vim/issues/104#issuecomment-37683738). Granted, one of the problems there was that it needed more special-case handling workarounds for people that wanted to...

Fair points. I'm certainly not opposed to adding the feature and think some people will like it if it's solid, just wanted to air those counterpoints for discussion. My vote...