WSIS_BBTP icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
WSIS_BBTP copied to clipboard

Can you share your 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' file?

Open whitesockcat opened this issue 5 years ago • 5 comments

As i known, regular voc_cocostyle file only contain bbox annotation[x1,y1,x2,y2] and segmentation annotation are [x1y1,x2,y1,x2,y2,x1y2] style, which can't precisely calculate your map for segmentation as ground truth.

So do you use the 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' with precisely segmentation annotation?

And would you like to share your file?

Thanks!

whitesockcat avatar Dec 25 '19 02:12 whitesockcat

As i known, regular voc_cocostyle file only contain bbox annotation[x1,y1,x2,y2] and segmentation annotation are [x1y1,x2,y1,x2,y2,x1y2] style, which can't precisely calculate your map for segmentation as ground truth.

So do you use the 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' with precisely segmentation annotation?

And would you like to share your file?

Thanks!

Have you solved that problem? If so, could you share me the annotation file, thanks!

zhoulw13 avatar Jan 06 '20 04:01 zhoulw13

no i'm still waiting for reply from @chengchunhsu

---Original--- From: "Liwang Zhou"<[email protected]> Date: 2020/1/6 12:05:08 To: "chengchunhsu/WSIS_BBTP"<[email protected]>; Cc: "Author"<[email protected]>;"whitesockcat"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: [chengchunhsu/WSIS_BBTP] Can you share your 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' file? (#3)

As i known, regular voc_cocostyle file only contain bbox annotation[x1,y1,x2,y2] and segmentation annotation are [x1y1,x2,y1,x2,y2,x1y2] style, which can't precisely calculate your map for segmentation as ground truth.

So do you use the 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' with precisely segmentation annotation?

And would you like to share your file?

Thanks!

Have you solved that problem? If so, could you share me the annotation file, thanks!

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

whitesockcat avatar Jan 06 '20 06:01 whitesockcat

Hi all,

We do not use files in COCO format for final validation in this project. The validation part is based on matlab API, which directly loads the png files.

Yet, I did convert VOC validation set into COCO format for another project. The file 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' can be found here.

Noted that I have not tested it on the released code. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best, Cheng-Chun

chengchunhsu avatar Jan 14 '20 19:01 chengchunhsu

Hi all,

We do not use files in COCO format for final validation in this project. The validation part is based on matlab API, which directly loads the png files.

Yet, I did convert VOC validation set into COCO format for another project. The file 'voc_2012_val_cocostyle' can be found here.

Noted that I have not tested it on the released code. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best, Cheng-Chun

Hi, can you also provide voc_2012_aug_train_cocostyle ? Thanks in advance.

fiona-lxd avatar Apr 26 '20 11:04 fiona-lxd

@chengchunhsu I think convert the voc segm data to RLEs will help this issue. Except data, is the evaluation code of voc different from that of coco?

voidrank avatar Sep 12 '20 17:09 voidrank