impressionist in background

[staffler-xyz]

I have a general question about the impressionist gem: Is there any performance gain to use a background queue (e.g. delayed_job) to process the calls?

Let's say i have 40 impressionst(object) calls in my controller. Would it be better to delay all of them in a background method?

Thanks in advance for you answer!

[jason0415]

the same problem...

[zenati]

Same problem. Is it possible to use delayed_job and how ? Thank you.

[niuage]

If you really wanted to, I think it would be fairly easy to override the impressionist method, but instead of calling obj.impressions.create, you would schedule the job... I don't think there's another straightforward solution :( I'd be nice if the gem had extracted obj.impressions.create(associative_create_statement...) into a method.

[jpaulo]

That would be a very nice feature. I already use resque for background processing in my application, so this would really take a load off the controller and improve response time.

[AndreiMotinga]

+1

[trivett]

Anyone on this thread figure out a workaround for delayed job? Having similar, equally predictable performance issues.