Vladimír Gorej
Vladimír Gorej
Interesting idea. I would suggest to create two separate functions `evolveWith` and `evolveDeepWith`. IMHO this functions is closer to ramdas http://ramdajs.com/docs/#evolve then `replace` function and should use the same nomenclature....
Yeah that's because we don't have icon ;] We need to create our or branding. My colleague @patricksmms could lend us a hand. I've been using modification of Ramdas logo...
Icon can now be made from https://github.com/char0n/ramda-adjunct/issues/592
There was an issue in ramda what is the distinction between the *By and *With. I'll try to find it. Can you pls provide some formalization of the rules if...
Your argumentation seems valid. What we can do to create alias for `renameKeysWith` and call it `renameKeysBy` and create a deprecation strategy for original `renameKeysWith`. Or we can extend the...
You're right. Second solution would be a breaking change. Callback would consume value as the first argument and key as second. I tend to like the second option, which extend...
@rockymadden thanks make sense to me. We can introduce new `renameObjKeysWith` and `renameObjKeysBy` and let `renameKeysWith` by an alias or `renameObjKeysBy`. What do you think ? //cc @lgy87
OK so decided then. I'll start executing this.
I'll address this next
@EarthyOrange can you pls verify this issue ? Thank you!