grimoirelab-graal
grimoirelab-graal copied to clipboard
[colic] Slow execution of ScanCode-CLI
- Scancode-CLI as reported, should be faster; but after being tested(below) is found to be slower when the number of files is huge.
| Repository | Commits | Files | Analyzer | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| chaoss/grimoirelab-graal | 192 | 54 | scancode_cli |
00:46:31 hr |
| chaoss/grimoirelab-graal | 192 | 54 | scancode |
02:14:11 hr |
- Evaluation results after integration with elk:
| Repository | Commits | Files | Analyzer | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| xiph/vorbis | 1520 | 1425 | scancode_cli |
8:13:39 hr |
| xiph/vorbis | 1520 | 1425 | scancode |
8:50:21 hr |
- ScanCode checkout commit: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/commit/c697222cec7b7ef5a122bf9f64eeef5a4ede11f9
- ScanCode-CLI checkout commit: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/commit/96069fd84066c97549d54f66bd2fe8c7813c6b52
I'll check whether similar numbers for xiph/vorbis are obtained when using just graal. Thanks for reporting this issue @inishchith
@valeriocos Did you get time to check this issue?
I couldn't, sorry, but I have it in my TODO list :)
No worries. Thanks for the quick response!
@valeriocos I'll start a execution of CoLic task for some of the repositories (the list) and share the reports here. and then I'll open up a issue ticket to discuss the differences/issues with the results (if any) WDYT?
Hi @inishchith , that sounds great! thanks!