Shawn Yang

I see, thanks. We've formulized fury cross-language serialization spec in https://fury.apache.org/docs/guide/xlang_object_graph_guide . It should be easier to implement a new language now.

Will It create lots of Fury objects? For example, if we have million of virtual threads, will we have millions of Fury object?

> please assign me,thanks! Great! Feel free to ask if you have further questions when implement this feature.

We may need to add a new maven module to fury/java. And I'm wondering whether can we use ThreadPoolFury, which use an object pool. This may be more friently to...

> Hi, i'm new in here and want to do some work. It seems to be inactivated for a while and i want to try this. Could you assign this...

> > Apache OpenDAL give a good example about how to make a new release: https://opendal.apache.org/community/committers/release > > Thank you for the reference! Please be aware that OpenDAL is a...

I'm working on this already, and will create a PR in next days

Hi @tommyettinger , let's continue the discussion in https://github.com/apache/incubator-fury/issues/1274#issuecomment-1997259888 . We used `0.25` as the default loader actor for class serializer dispatch in https://github.com/apache/incubator-fury/blob/main/java/fury-core/src/main/java/org/apache/fury/resolver/ClassResolver.java#L201 . But for reference tracking, we...

Just found that fury has already removed the hash multiplication: ```java protected int place(K item) { return System.identityHashCode(item) & mask; } ```

Looking forward to your benchmark results