chai
chai copied to clipboard
chaijs
BDD / TDD assertion framework for node.js and the browser that can be paired with any testing framework.
Can someone please help me understand the **history** or **reasoning** behind why `assert.deepEqual()` does not behave exactly the same as `expect().deep.equal()`? ```js const { expect, assert } = require('chai') const...
We have a piece of code which does the following: ``` async caller_function(param) { test_function(param) param.property = 'two' } caller_function({property: 'one'}) ``` And we want to assert the following: ```...
According to [the docs](https://www.chaijs.com/api/bdd/#method_a), `a` as well as `an` can be used as language chains. However, TypeScript does not permit this. It is possible to fix the issue by simply...
 You should invert these two words. Why because all Chai api use "actual" first and "expected" second in arguments.
my code expect({ company: 'Final Test' }).to.deep.equal( response.body); Actual Response [{"id":"gshs-gsy-4d9f-83e0","company":"Final Test","title":"","name":" homeins"}] I want to validate the company : Final Test Cypress test results expected { company: Final Test...
Given a `func` that is not throwing. This code passes: ```js expect(() => func()).to.throw; ``` but this code does not: ```js expect(() => func()).to.throw(); ``` This accident was hiding in...
Not a huge deal but it's awkward that we have to use incorrect English grammar in this case. Most significantly it's probably a bit confusing for first-timers. Would be nice...
Running the following code: ```javascript const chai = require('chai') chai.use(require('dirty-chai')) chai.use(require('chai-as-promised')) chai.expect({a: 1}).to.have.property('a').that.is.a('number') // copied from the docs ``` results in this error: ```console $ node test.js /path/to/project/node_modules/chai/lib/chai/assertion.js:141 throw new...
I am using [email protected] According to docs: ``` var obj = { val: 10 }; var fn = function() { obj.val = 5 }; assert.doesNotDecreaseBy(fn, obj, 'val', 1); ``` should...
All the arrays in my object are meant to be sets, so while comparing multiple objects, I want every array comparison to be unordered. Many times these arrays are nested....
