chaals

@fantasai wrote: > To clarify, if the Board decides not to invite the AB liaisons to its > meetings, it will be in compliance with the Bylaws but in >violation...

The Board can simply decide to ask the AB to nominate liaisons able to attend its meetings, and the AB can make a decision on how to do that. To...

You cannot define a formal liaison between a body established by the ByLaws and a body established by the process without creating dependencies. (If the Bylaws requests AB liaison and...

As noted in #668 I don't think this is a valid approach to resolve the issue :/

@dwsinger some partial answers (I don't think we have completely settled this): There are timelines already in the process - they don't stop a council being spun up, but the...

> if they did exactly something that the Objector had characterized as being an appropriate way to deal with their FO, then we're done. (Note: that the objector should have...

> the objector has ceded their ability to reply to the council no, they can still send stuff to the council. The council is not obliged to wait for them...

The original point of a council was to have someone who wasn't the Team making the decisions. If that seems like a bad idea (and there are cases where I...

I don't think we should do this. I think this is an excessive complication for an issue that arises rarely. In practice, it is possible for a candidate who got...

I suspect incumbent bias is largely based on perceptions of the electors that this is a hard job that takes time to learn, and it's important to put people in...