chaals

@cwilso wrote: > but disagree on the effect - in fact, factions can frequently get TWO candidates elected (one per cycle), rather than one. Which is to say that we...

@cwilso wrote > The stated goal of using STV was to "promote diversity"; that is "avoid moderates" by another name. No, diversity is not "avoid moderates". It is (and was...

@dwsinger wrote > No one shall be both a party and an adjudicator. This makes sense, except perhaps where the decision being contested is a collective one and the decision-making...

Is the "experiment debrief" available, or was this confidential to AB members or to W3C members? Is it true that this issue is only relevant if the suggestion of handling...

I'm still unconvinced by any recusal proposal - the set of people without an interest in the issue seems approximately the set of people least likely to inform a good...

Can you please clarify whether you expect volunteer chairs to record how the proposals align to the membership agreement, or merely to gag any discussion on or consideration of a...

I suggest we rename the issue to something more descriptive, such as "how to assign each of the director's roles". I believe there is a clear understanding among the AB...

My biggest concern with this is how we select the NomCom, and how the NomCom itself decides on candidates. Overall I am not a big fan of the proposal, but...

@dwsinger it seems you and @michaelchampion are talking about different things. **IFF** we have an approach like this, I think it makes more sense to approve or reject the slate...

@dwsinger the Objection Decision Committee essentially gives an elected subset of the AC a powerful decision-making role, instead of the advisory role they generally play. While in principle they are...