CGiachalis

You can modify `getRow()` and `getCol()` to get a sliced array : CODE ```c++ #include using namespace arma; // [[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]] // [[Rcpp::export]] arma::cube getRow2(arma::cube cb, int i) { cb.print("Cube:"); auto...

@braverock - Not sure what is your point here. > just to clarify... 'adjusted' prices aren't prices anymore It will be the total return price series on which we're interested...

FYI - The new version (0.55.0) provides all `ties.method` options, see: https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/matrixStats/pull/146

Thanks Joshua. No, it's not an issue at all. It's more a question of consistency, i.e., `na.omit()` or `split()` do not check that the class of the object matches the...

Thanks for your prompt reply! From R perspective, a user doesn't expect zero-based indexing but since it is intentional there is no problem - as long as it is documented...

Yes -> replacement of the logical value `FALSE` with `getOption("mlpack.verbose", FALSE)`. That's it. > what needs to happen to the R package to add something like that? You're already told...

Thanks!